Plots the dual variables resulting from optweight()
in a way similar to
figure 2 of Zubizarreta (2015), which explained how to interpret these
values. These represent the cost of changing the constraint on the variance
of the resulting weights. For covariates with large values of the dual
variable, tightening the constraint will increase the variability of the
weights, and loosening the constraint will decrease the variability of the
weights, both to a greater extent than would doing the same for covariate
with small values of the dual variable.
Arguments
- x
An
optweight
oroptweight.svy
object; the output of a call tooptweight()
oroptweight.svy()
.- ...
Ignored.
- which.time
For longitudinal treatments, which time period to display. Only one may be displayed at a time.
References
Zubizarreta, J. R. (2015). Stable Weights that Balance Covariates for Estimation With Incomplete Outcome Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(511), 910–922. doi:10.1080/01621459.2015.1023805
See also
optweight()
or optweight.svy()
to estimate
the weights and the dual variables
plot.summary.optweight()
for plots of the distribution of
weights
Examples
library("cobalt")
data("lalonde", package = "cobalt")
#Balancing covariates between treatment groups (binary)
ow1 <- optweight(treat ~ age + educ + married +
nodegree + re74, data = lalonde,
tols = c(.1, .1, .1, .1, .1),
estimand = "ATT")
summary(ow1) # Note the coefficient of variation
#> Summary of weights:
#>
#> - Weight ranges:
#> Min Max
#> treated 1 || 1.0000
#> control 0 |---------------------------| 1.5946
#>
#> - Units with 5 greatest weights by group:
#>
#> 1 2 3 4 5
#> treated 1 1 1 1 1
#> 79 118 127 156 164
#> control 1.5946 1.5946 1.5946 1.5946 1.5946
#>
#> RMSE Dev Mean Abs Dev Max Abs Dev # Zeros
#> treated 0.0000 0.0000 0 0
#> control 0.5319 0.4619 1 0
#>
#> - Effective Sample Sizes:
#> Control Treated
#> Unweighted 429.000 185
#> Weighted 334.408 185
#>
# and effective sample size (ESS)
plot(ow1) # age has a low value, married is high
ow2 <- optweight(treat ~ age + educ + married +
nodegree + re74, data = lalonde,
tols = c(0, .1, .1, .1, .1),
estimand = "ATT")
summary(ow2) # Notice that tightening the constraint
#> Summary of weights:
#>
#> - Weight ranges:
#> Min Max
#> treated 1 || 1.0000
#> control 0 |---------------------------| 1.7539
#>
#> - Units with 5 greatest weights by group:
#>
#> 1 2 3 4 5
#> treated 1 1 1 1 1
#> 419 404 412 387 395
#> control 1.7343 1.7441 1.7441 1.7539 1.7539
#>
#> RMSE Dev Mean Abs Dev Max Abs Dev # Zeros
#> treated 0.0000 0.0000 0 0
#> control 0.5338 0.4649 1 0
#>
#> - Effective Sample Sizes:
#> Control Treated
#> Unweighted 429.000 185
#> Weighted 333.863 185
#>
# on age had a negligible effect on the
# variability of the weights and ESS
ow3 <- optweight(treat ~ age + educ + married +
nodegree + re74, data = lalonde,
tols = c(.1, .1, 0, .1, .1),
estimand = "ATT")
summary(ow3) # In contrast, tightening the constraint
#> Summary of weights:
#>
#> - Weight ranges:
#> Min Max
#> treated 1 || 1.0000
#> control 0 |---------------------------| 1.8712
#>
#> - Units with 5 greatest weights by group:
#>
#> 1 2 3 4 5
#> treated 1 1 1 1 1
#> 419 404 412 387 395
#> control 1.857 1.8641 1.8641 1.8712 1.8712
#>
#> RMSE Dev Mean Abs Dev Max Abs Dev # Zeros
#> treated 0.0000 0.0000 0 0
#> control 0.6763 0.6473 1 0
#>
#> - Effective Sample Sizes:
#> Control Treated
#> Unweighted 429.000 185
#> Weighted 294.354 185
#>
# on married had a large effect on the
# variability of the weights, shrinking
# the ESS